CHP on the basis of an ORC process (Organic Rankine Cycle) with biomass
Difference compared to the steam turbine cycle
The difference compared to the steam turbine cycle is that instead of water an organic working fluid (hydrocarbons like isopentane, iso-octane, toluene or silicone fluid) is used. Since this working fluid vaporizes at lower temperatures than water, the process can better be adjusted to a fuel like biomass with its low combustion temperatures.
In order to delay the ageing process of the working fluid, the permitted temperatures close to the wall may not be exceeded. Therefore an intermediate thermo oil cycle allowing better temperature control is necessary.
The thermo oil cycle further allows depressurized operating at high temperatures and thus does not require a steam guard.
Functionality
The exhaust gas resulting from the combustion process in the biomass boiler supplies heat to the thermo oil cycle. Later the heat is fed to an organic working fluid which therefore vaporizes. The vaporized fluid is expanded in a turbine and the obtained mechanical work is passed to a generator where it is converted into electrical energy. The expanded fluid then enters a condenser where the discharged heat is available at a temperature level which allows the operating of a hot-water network for district or process heat supply. Later the condensate is brought to operating pressure by the pump and is fed to the evaporator again.
In order to increase electrical output, the working fluid escaping from the turbine can be passed through a recuperator (not included in the figure) before it enters the condenser.
Set-up of an ORC plant
| Figure 25: Set-up of an ORC process |
|
|
Application
- For decentralized power and heat supply of medium output (~300 kWel and more)
- Examples: timber industry, industry (drying processes), housing estates
Possible fuels
- biomass
- basically every fuel is possible
Advantages
- very good part-load performance
- technology maturity
Disadvantages
- intermediate thermo oil cycle necessary (costs !)
- little experiences with ORC plants with biomass firing
- relatively high investment costs
In table 18 some data from a plant within a certain range of performance is outlined.
| Table 18: Data of an ORC process |
| Plant size ~500 kWel(biomass-fired) |
Unit |
Value |
| Specific investment costs |
[EUR/kWel] |
~ 2.300 |
| Silicon oil |
[EUR/l] |
~ 22 |
| Specific maintenance costs |
[EUR/kWhel] |
0,007 |
| Electrical efficiency [etha]el |
[%] |
10 - 20 |
| Overall efficiency |
[%] |
up to 85 |
| Emissions (NOx) |
[mg/Nm³] |
Depending on fuel~ 250-400 |
|
Best operational mode
Power or heat operated
Design:
ORC plants are offered as complete modules. The electrical output of an ORC module ranges between 200 and 1500 kWel. Higher plant output can be achieved by a parallel operation of modules.
The main part of heat supply is realized in the combustion chamber; but exhaust gas heat can further be utilized by releasing the heat in an economizer. The recovered heat can be used additionally for district and process heat, thus increasing overall efficiency of the plant. Besides that, exhaust gas utilization in the economizer allows a lower operating temperature of the condenser because the necessary heat for reaching the required final temperature for process heat is supplied by the economizer. Thus the electrical efficiency of the plant can be improved.
Usually silicone fluid is used as an organic working fluid in a closed cycle because it is neither toxic nor a greenhouse gas.
Picture of an ORC plant:
Figure 26 shows an ORC plant like it was used for the timber industry in Admont.
| Figure 26: ORC plant in Admont (Source Bios Bioenergiesysteme) |
|
|
Control:
Control of the ORC process can be reached through the heat supply in the boiler.
Operating state:
- Evaporating pressure of the working fluid: 10 bar
- Exhaust gas temperature from the boiler: 300 °C
Maintenance
ORC plants basically require little maintenance work. Maintenance works amount to about 4 hours a week.
The working fluid (usually silicone fluid) has to be replaced after about 20 years.
Ecological aspects
The frequently used silicone fluid doesn't have any ozone-depleting potential, it is easily combustible but not explosive. Because of the low flash point (34°C) leakage losses of the working fluid have to be widely avoided.
Because of the high service life of the fluid (up to 20 years) no replacement is required.
Conditions for an efficient operating on biomass basis
- High amount of annual full-load operating hours (> 4000 h)
achievable through proper plant design
- High possible efficiency
achievable through heat-oriented design
- Utilization of cheap fuel assortments
e. g. sawing by-products, production waste
Weak points
The low process temperature resulting from biomass utilization and limited upwards by the thermal stability of the working fluid and the thermo oil only allows relatively low efficiency.
Stage of development
In the field of geothermics there are already many ORC plants used. Therefore the process represents a proven technology.
In 1999 Austria's first biomass-fired ORC plant was put in operation by the timber industry in Admont (Styria). Further plants are being planned.
Some important parameters regarding stage of development and outlook are summed up in the following table. (Source: Dezentrale Biomasse-Kraft-Wärme-Kopplungstechnologien).
| Table 19: Stage of development / outlook |
| Stage of development / outlook |
status |
| Present stage of development |
demonstration stage 1) |
| Short term cost reduction potential |
medium 2) |
| Short term development potential |
los 2) |
1) Stages of development: concept stage, laboratory stage, pilot stage, demonstration stage, market maturity
2) 1 year...high, 2 years...medium, 3 years...low |
|
[ previous chapter 2.4 ] <= [ Technology Profile ] => [ next chapter 2.6 ]

|